Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rustina Sharpe's avatar

“When we genuinely inquire into something, we rarely remain neatly inside a single topic or subject area. Instead, inquiry requires us to move between disciplines, to make connections between a range of skills and knowledge and most importantly, it invites us to bring our prior understandings, experiences and questions along with us. Learning becomes richer because it relates more closely to the reality of how human brains process the information we gather about the world around us. That world is not organised into curriculum boxes.”

I have been trying to find the words to express my own thoughts about inquiry based learning, as well as problem based learning. (Both are similar, but have their own niches). I prefer them over explicitly using explicit teaching.

I believe and am working on how to show the explicit teaching embedded in inquiry- and problem- based teaching. Yet when I try to defend my arguments, those who are for the I Do, We Do, You Do; just do not want to listen.

Derek's avatar

Loved this… learning mathematics is rather like what you say: “ To be a ‘truth-teller’, every interpretation needs to remain open to challenge and every argument open to revision in the face of new evidence.” Except that what you call ‘evidence’ is better described as ‘what is inconsistent’ and doesn’t stand up to rigour… what will cause what you think to break down in the face of further thought. In this sense mathematics is a set of truth procedures. Being good at mathematics… near perfect at school level… led me into trouble as I started to discover a world filled with dishonesty and inconvenient truths that a person was asked not to question. For this very reason we must demand a better world that lives up to what we are taught when we are taught to think about ideas and to interpret. I do believe that young people of today will demand this!

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?